Trump Says He Sees ‘Collusion’ Against Republicans on Social Media Platforms

Reuters
By Reuters
March 20, 2019Politics
share
Trump Says He Sees ‘Collusion’ Against Republicans on Social Media Platforms
President Donald Trump speaks during a joint news conference with Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, on March 19, 2019. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

WASHINGTON—Republican President Donald Trump said on March 19, that social media platforms discriminated against members of his party, and accused the companies of collusion.

“It seems to be if they’re conservative, if they’re Republicans, if they’re in a certain group, there’s discrimination, and big discrimination, and I see it absolutely on Twitter and Facebook … and others,” Trump said at a joint White House news conference with Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.

“We use the word ‘collusion’ very loosely all the time, and I will tell you there is collusion with respect to that because something has to be going on,” Trump said.

by Roberta Rampton

Ex-Google Engineer Claims Anti-Conservative Discrimination in Lawsuit

A former Google engineer who wrote a controversial memo criticizing the company’s diversity policies sued the tech giant on Monday for allegedly discriminating against white male conservatives.

James Damore, who was fired in 2017 in the aftermath of the scathing memo, brought forward the class action lawsuit on Jan. 8, the Guardian reported. Appended to the suit are nearly 100 pages of screenshots of internal communications in which employees discuss sensitive political issues.

According to the lawsuit, “Google employees who expressed views deviating from the majority view at Google on political subjects raised in the workplace and relevant to Google’s employment policies and its business, such as ‘diversity’ hiring policies, ‘bias sensitivity,’ or ‘social justice’ were/are singled out, mistreated, and systematically punished and terminated from Google, in violation of their legal rights.”

Damore and lawyer Harmeet Dhillon held a news conference in San Francisco and said the company discriminated against white men who held political views different from those of Google executives.

“Google’s open hostility for conservative thought is paired with invidious discrimination on the basis of race and gender, barred by law,” the lawsuit says. “Google’s management goes to extreme—and illegal—lengths to encourage hiring managers to take protected categories such as race and/or gender into consideration as determinative hiring factors, to the detriment of Caucasian and male employees and potential employees at Google.”

Another former Google engineer, David Gudeman, is also a member of the suit, according to the complaint filed in Santa Clara Superior Court in northern California.

“Damore, Gudeman, and other class members were ostracized, belittled, and punished for their heterodox political views, and for the added sin of their birth circumstances of being Caucasians and/or males,” the suit says.

Damore was sacked last August in the wake of his contentious 10-page memo, published in full on Gizmodo, and has been unemployed ever since.

Widely reported as controversial is his assertion that biological differences are why there are fewer woman engineers.

“Note, I’m not saying that all men differ from women in the following ways or that these differences are “just,” the memo reads. “I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. Many of these differences are small and there’s significant overlap between men and women, so you can’t say anything about an individual given these population level distributions.”

Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai denounced the memo for “advancing harmful gender stereotypes.” The company told the Los Angeles Times that it fired Damore for violating its code of conduct.

“We look forward to defending against Mr. Damore’s lawsuit in court,” a Google spokesperson stated in an e-mail.

Google’s workforce, akin to the entire the tech industry, is overwhelmingly white, Asian, and male.

Of its workers, 56 percent are white and 35 percent are Asian, while Hispanic and black employees make up 4 percent and 2 percent, respectively, according to the company’s latest diversity report.

In 2017, the U.S. Department of Labor accused Google of “extreme pay discrimination” against women, and a group of women have filed a class-action lawsuit alleging systemic wage discrimination.

But the Damore suit says it’s exposing a cultural bias toward promoting diversity and “social justice” that, according to the suit, has created a “protected, distorted bubble of groupthink.”

It charges that efforts to increase representation of women and minorities amount to illegal discrimination against the majority.

Appended to the lawsuit are many examples of internal Google communications that allegedly support the claims.

One of these is a 2014 email from former vice-president of PR at Google Rachel Whetstone:

“It seems like we believe in free expression except when people disagree with the majority view … I have lost count of the times at Google, for example, people tell me privately that they cannot admit their voting choice if they are Republican because they fear how other Googlers react.”

The suit also reveals internal backlash Damore allegedly faced after his memo went viral, including a mass email in which a Google director called the memo “repulsive and intellectually dishonest.”

There’s also reference to an email to Damore from a fellow engineer, the Guardian reported, calling him a “misogynist and a terrible human,” and they would “keep hounding you until one of us is fired.”

According to legal experts cited by the Washington Post, Google the right to fire employees it deems incompatible with the company’s values.

Companies based in the United States—some of which are global entities with employees numbering in the hundreds of thousands—are exempt from the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantees, which are only aimed at the government.

The Epoch Times reporter Tom Ozimek contributed to this report.

ntd newsletter icon
Sign up for NTD Daily
What you need to know, summarized in one email.
Stay informed with accurate news you can trust.
By registering for the newsletter, you agree to the Privacy Policy.
Comments